Rebuttal Reports

Crashteams experts are highly experienced in reviewing reports submitted by other experts. Our intention in reviewing these reports on your behalf is to discover any of the following:

• Incorrect assumptions that might impact calculation results
• Faulty input data – from vehicle damage information, scene measurement data, or other raw data source
• Incorrect interpretation of evidence
• Oversights in evidence reviews
• Mistakes in calculations
• Improper methods or procedures in relation to best practices
• Improper use of computer software to calculate, simulate or animate results.

We do not engage in nit-picking and are focused on discovering issues which impact  the outcome of the case. We might simply tell you after a short review - that essentially the report is correct and it may not make sense to engage us to deliver a formal rebuttal report. In that case, we will give you some tips on cross-examination questions that might assist you.

If we do discover important issues with the accuracy of the report, we will deliver a powerful and comprehensive report outlining the problems and also provide support for our opinion wherever appropriate. This would mean providing technical literature and references that support our opinion.